read more posts by
Cameron Exposed
In the span of little more than a week, the Cameron R-1 school district has had three different videos released that should concern any red-blooded, Constitution-loving Americans. These videos raise concerns about our public education system and what is being taught about our God-given rights, which are defined and protected by the Constitution.
Cameron school district police department
The first video includes the entire Cameron school district police department and its lead officer, Palmer. It shows a brief conversation between SRO Palmer and resident Heath Gilbert. Gilbert asks Palmer if he will be arrested for speaking to staff—something school superintendent Matt Robinson ordered in a ban letter. Palmer appears to believe that his chief of police, school superintendent Matt Robinson, has the authority to deny First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press by decree through a ban order.
Why Palmer’s stance is so concerning
In addition to swearing an oath to support and defend the Constitution as a law enforcement officer, SRO Johnny Palmer has also sworn that oath as a 22 year veteran of Missouri Army National Guard. Palmer appears to not understand that the Fourteenth Amendment protects all our civil liberties and guarantees they can’t be denied without due process of law. Palmer has sworn that oath twice but doesn’t appear to understand or honor those oaths.
School board president Andi Lockridge restricts Landi’s 1st Amendment
In our second video, local resident Dan Landi is attempting to address the board of education about school curriculum. When Landi mentions the word “pornographic,” a reference to adult books used as CHS curriculum material, Lockridge was quick to interrupt his address. Landi pointedly asked why she was trying to restrict his First Amendment rights. Her response?
“Because you’re not staying on topic. “ – Cameron R-1 school board president Andi Lockridge
Several concerns with Lockridge’s silencing of Landi’s freedom of speech
In the complete Landi address video,
I see several civil rights concerns. There appear to be several attempts to force Landi to stop reading from his prepared notes and instead talk about a document that the district had displayed on the wall-mounted monitors. Those interactions have the ring of compelled speech.
The “cause” for the frequent interruptions during Landi’s address appears to be based on the assertion that Landi was getting off topic. The final straw for Lockridge, and what ultimately caused her to terminate the remainder of his designated public comment period, was his attempt to bring books into his curriculum topic. Since when are books not related to school curriculum?
The implied threat of being forcibly removed or arrested
If you begin watching Dan’s address video at the 5-minute and 5-second mark, you will see that SRO Palmer has approached Landi and confronted him to get Landi to stop speaking and to sit down. After several requests to sit down, Palmer states, “I am going to ask you one more time,” and Landi responds with, “Or else what?” Palmer responds by saying:
“You and I are going to go outside.” – SRO Palmer
While Palmer doesn’t say the words “you will be arrested,” I would argue that it was implied when he told Landi that they would be going outside if Landi didn’t stop and go sit down. Those words, and Palmer’s close proximity to Landi, were arguably enough to chill speech. That could be argued to be a First Amendment violation.
A Likely Defense from the District to Any Possible First Amendment Claim
In this video, you can repeatedly hear Lockridge say variations of things such as “please sit down” and “I am asking you to sit down.” The Cameron school district or their attorneys would likely argue that he was asked to sit down—he wasn’t forced. I see two problems with that argument. Back to the video: at the 4-minute and 55-second mark, look towards the right side of the screen to the man in the background. That is superintendent Matt Robinson, and he runs the timer. Watch as he reaches out and removes the timer from the table. It will be difficult to argue that Landi could have continued talking with the timer stopped and removed from the table.
Small chance they would have given Landi unlimited time to continue to talk about books. When you add Lockridge’s threat—”I am warning you, if you go off topic your time is over”—the removal of the timer is a clear indication that the Cameron school district carried out that warning. Combine the actions of SRO Palmer and I believe Landi has a very strong First Amendment claim.
Similar event in Lawrence led to lawsuit against Lawrence school district
To help support my claim that Landi has a legitimate complaint against the Cameron school district, I am going to reference some breaking news. In a recent Libs of TikTok post on X, we see a lawsuit filed against the Lawrence, Kansas USD 497 for accusations of First Amendment violations after that school board had a mother’s microphone shut off. I agree with Libs of TikTok: HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE. We will be following this federal lawsuit with great interest. Give them the business, Ms. Schmidt!
If you’re on X, please go show this post some love.
Resident Given Ban Despite Offering Proof Accusations Were False
The final video showing the Cameron school district has contempt for the Constitution is from a special hearing held to allow Heath Gilbert to appeal an indefinite ban. The discussion and vote can be seen in the following video clip. The full hearing video can be watched on the Show Me Transparency YouTube page, with the link taking you to that video. For an excellent summary of what is happening in this video, go read the write up from Hick Christian.
School board members are supposed to uphold the constitution
In the state of Missouri, elected school board members are required to swear an oath before they can begin to serve on the board. All Missouri school board members must take the oath prescribed by Article VII, Section 11 of the Missouri Constitution, which requires them to “take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the United States and of this state, and to demean themselves faithfully in office.”
I contend that the actions or inactions of these Cameron school board members are a violation of their oath of office. The board is elected to serve and safeguard the interests of the residents who make this school possible through significant taxes. Watching these videos leaves me with a very strong opinion: the Cameron R-1 school board members are captured and serve the school district, not the community. The board is in direct violation of their oath of office.
The Cameron R-1 school district has been fully embroiled in a book controversy with concerned parents and taxpayers over library books with content described as “adult” and “sexually explicit” since February 2023. During all these months since the first books were found, the Cameron R-1 school district has honored Missouri Sunshine Law requests and allowed inspection of library books and curriculum materials on school property. The school district now appears to refuse to allow further inspections and has provided instructions to instead go to a public library.
Recently, I was forwarded an email dated August 14 that originated from the Cameron school district. This email was in response to a verbal request to inspect books inside the Cameron High School library. Originally, a high school administrator had agreed to allow Landi access to the library on a day when no staff or students would be present. As you can see in this screenshot, the district seems to have indicated it will no longer comply with Missouri law and allow the inspection of books.
What laws allow inspections of these books?
First, the Missouri Sunshine Law, Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 610, allows for the inspection of public records. Every one of our previous requests to inspect books required the Cameron school district to insist we submit a Sunshine Law request as a condition of being able to inspect those books. They complied with each records request and allowed us to inspect those books—until now.
Additionally, Missouri Revised Statute Section 170.231 specifically allows for inspection of curriculum materials. Arguably, any book that was used as part of classroom instruction and was required reading could be classified as “curriculum material.” Failure to allow the inspection of one of these books could potentially be a violation of this statute.
Consequences for failure to allow inspection of curriculum materials
Missouri Revised Statute Section 162.091 indicates that failure to comply with the inspection of curriculum materials could be considered a misdemeanor and punishable by a $500 fine OR imprisonment in county jail for up to one year.
This statute states: “Any county clerk, county treasurer, school board member, officer or employee, or other officer, who willfully neglects or refuses to perform any duty imposed upon him by chapters 160 to 168, 170, 171, 177 and 178, or who willfully violates any provision of these chapters, is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year.”
Since the right to inspect curriculum materials is established under RSMo 170.231 (which falls under Chapter 170), any school official who “willfully neglects or refuses” to allow public inspection of curriculum materials as required by law would be committing a misdemeanor under Section 162.091.
What Cameron school district policies address sunshine law requests
According to Policy C-145-P: District Information and Records, the Cameron school district is obligated to comply with and fulfill Missouri Sunshine Law requests. The policy commits the district to ensuring public access to meetings, records, and votes as required by Missouri’s Sunshine Law, while recognizing that some records may be legally closed to the public.
This policy directly implements the district’s obligations under Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 610 (the Missouri Sunshine Law) by establishing the framework for public records access and designating the responsible officials.
Considering the Cameron school district has treated all previous requests to inspect books and curriculum materials as Sunshine Law requests, refusal to allow additional requests to inspect books would appear to be a deliberate and willful act to ignore the law.
Policy C-105-P: District Rules and Guides
This policy broadly requires all staff to follow district rules, which include legal compliance:
- “All Board members, employees, students and patrons are required to follow the District’s rules and regulations.”
- “The Superintendent, administrators and District supervisors are required to implement and enforce District policies, the Administrative Manual, the Employee Manual, and the Student/Parent Handbook.”
Refusal to comply with policy or law is potentially a violation of the employment contract
In previous records requests, we had the opportunity to inspect a Cameron school district employee’s employment contract with the district. That contract required the then-school district employee to comply with all school district policy and laws. For a school district employee to knowingly not comply with board-approved policy or the law could be a violation of their contract and grounds for possible termination of their employment.
A superintendent instructing staff to not comply with Missouri law and district policy is problematic
As a general rule, the school superintendent is responsible for ensuring the law and district rules are both followed and enforced. He serves both the district and the community—their bosses—and should lead by example as he carries out that responsibility. To instruct staff to intentionally ignore school policy and state law is in itself a violation of policy.
The employees who are instructed to ignore requests to inspect books and curriculum are being set up for failure. They are caught between risking reprimand for ignoring the instructions of the superintendent or potentially violating the law. Regardless of which action the employee takes, they are risking possible job termination.
The school superintendent is supposed to lead by example. By instructing staff to violate law and policy he is creating a toxic work environment. It also undermines both respect and confidence of staff in the ability of their chief executive officer to be fair, impartial and unbiased.
Is it possible the intent of the district was misunderstood?
It’s possible, but I am highly skeptical. We have reached out for comment from the district and those details will follow. Reviewing the email, the text is quite specific.
After speaking with Dr. Robinson to verify up-to-date procedures, I was informed that we are no longer accommodating requests to come into the building to review books. If there are specific books that you have concerns with, please provide the list of titles to the district for the review committee to review. You are always welcome to visit the public library that is located at 312 N Chestnut St and review the books in person.
Had the district been willing to allow the inspection of books in other buildings, such as the central office, that would have been included in this email. There should also have been some instructions on submitting a records request. It wasn’t. The only mention of how to inspect physical books was a suggestion that Mr. Landi visit a public library. The intent behind this email appears to be that Mr. Landi can kick rocks. His days of trying to find and inform the district of sexually explicit books in its libraries are over.
What was his purpose behind inspecting the books
The district has been asked multiple times to police the books in their libraries for the arguably harmful content that isn’t appropriate for children. The school district refuses. Mr. Landi is among several concerned parents and taxpayers who have volunteered their time to identify books that contain sexually explicit content that may be harmful to minors. Because of the efforts of this group the district’s book review committee has identified and restricted more than 40 books. The district wouldn’t have known to review those books without his assistance. Those books and others he helped find are on our Cameron R-1 School’s Dirty Book List.
On the day he attended the district’s open house at the high school he was interested in getting a closer look at two books. One was a graphic novel by an author who has books restricted to adults only. The other he understood contained detailed descriptions of gang rape, murder, incest, explicit sex acts and necrophilia. Those don’t sound like very wholesome or family-values type reading. They should appreciate his efforts and welcome the free help from his group. Instead of being grateful for his assistance in protecting children from harmful material they’ve dismissed him. They told him to kick rocks.
What does the district have to say about this email and refusal to allow book inspections
We have submitted a request to Gina Bainum, the school district’s Communications Director, to ask for comment. We asked Mrs. Bainum the following: “Considering the school district required these book inspections occur through a Missouri Sunshine Law request, how does the school district justify the end of these inspections made through the Sunshine Law? Additionally, does this inspection refusal extend to books which are required reading in the classroom and mentioned on a class syllabus?”
Right before publishing this article, I heard back from the communications director in response to my request for comment. Mrs. Bainum had clarifying questions and indicated she wasn’t aware of the email sent to Mr. Landi. I have shared the screenshot from this article and am awaiting a response. If we receive any comment, this article will be updated.
For two and a half years, there has been a heated debate in Cameron, MO, over the books being provided to students with our tax dollars. In this article, we will explain why some people are so concerned. We will also share resources and explain how parents can research books and get a glimpse of their content to help you decide if you want your child to read them.
What exactly is in these books that has caused the uproar?
While the book fight is a national issue, we are going to concentrate on the books found in the Cameron R-1 schools. Our examples will be directed specifically to the CHS school and library, but the same steps can be applied to any school in almost any city or state.
While not all books found in the CHS library are as graphic, the most recent discovery is a perfect example of the content being promoted to children. The book Bag of Bones contains explicit descriptions of gang rape, incest, sexual nudity, sexual activities, self-harm and necrophilia.
The Cameron R-1 school district has secretly removed some of the books with explicit adult content. You can read about that in the article titled “Cameron R-1 school district sees reason and begins removing explicit books.”
The resource provided to parents by the Cameron R-1 school district
The Cameron R-1 school district has responded to concerns over these books by providing access to the online resource. It can be accessed at GoFollett.com by anyone and allows you to search a specific school’s library and get descriptions of the books found there.
That sounds helpful, but the descriptions lack information useful to parents in deciding if a book’s content is appropriate for their child. Let us use Bag of Bones as an example. In Destiny, you will find the following description of this adult book—the resource the school board expects parents to use to make informed decisions about whether their child should read it:
Novelist Mike Noonan, still grieving the death of his wife after four years, retreats to Sara Laughs, his isolated summer home, but the peace he is seeking slips even further from his grasp when he finds the community in the grip of a powerful millionaire, and his hideaway becomes the site of ghostly visitations.
Through the website RatedBooks, we get a better glimpse of what you can truly expect to find in this book’s pages. The following summary is taken from RatedBooks:
Summary of Concerns
This book contains; alcohol, alternate gender/sexual ideologies, anxiety/mental illness, bullying, dark content, death/grief, deception, derogatory terms, drugs, dubious consent, gang rape, gore, horror, incest, murder, necrophilia (invision/nightmares), obscene/explicit
sexual activities/sexual nudity, potentially patently offensive content, potentially prurient content, profanity, racism, self-harm, sexism, suicidal thoughts, and violence (graphic).
There is a vast difference between the information provided in the two resources, yet the school district and board of education only tell you about and encourage you to utilize Destiny.
More problems with Destiny
Destiny does indicate to parents which books have been restricted by the school district. One example is the book The Bluest Eye. As you can see in the screenshot below, this book is restricted.
Cameron R-1 doesn’t provide parents enough information to make an informed decision
You can see next to the “Call #” in the screenshot that the district has restricted this book and requires parental approval for students to check it out. What you do not see is the reason why the book was restricted. If you go to BookLooks, you will find a link to the content. Be forewarned: this book includes incest and molestation with a graphic first-person description of the pleasure a father feels as he impregnates his preteen daughter. How does the description in Destiny compare to BookLooks, and which resource should the school district be encouraging parents to use?
A three-person book review committee voted to restrict this book, but the district refuses to tell us why. Why then does the district refuse to allow a true informed decision by advising the public what kind of content is in these books? The committee knows what content is in this book; it is arguably what caused them to restrict it to only students above the age of 18. Why the secretary and lack of transparency?
How to determine if the books are right for your child
Unfortunately, there is no universal book rating system that makes this process easy for concerned parents. It will require effort on your part because the school district does not take responsibility for vetting the content they provide to your children. There are more than 30,000 books in the Cameron school district, and parents are left to research the content themselves.
There are numerous websites that maintain a list of concerning books which are easy to find. This website contains a list of books specific to the Cameron school district on our Dirty Book Page. We recommend copying the title you want to research and then logging into the Destiny Discover page by selecting your state, the school district, and finally the specific school within that district as shown below. Once you confirm the book is in your library, proceed to RatedBooks and see if they have a record of the book. Not every book is on RatedBooks.
How to proceed after finding a book you do not want your child to read
By default, any of the 40-some books the district has restricted are not available to students unless they are 18 years old. Unfortunately, we have reported upwards of 200 books to the district, and not everything with sexually explicit content is being restricted by the book review committee. If you find a book that isn’t restricted by the district, you can complete the district’s book restriction form. But be forewarned: you still need to monitor what books the district allows your child to access. In February of this year, the district was caught providing restricted books to students without parental consent during a Book Tasting event. Allegations were made that a school district employee completed parental consent forms so a child could read the restricted book The Hate You Give. As Ronald Reagan once said, trust but verify. You can track what books your student reads through Destiny—be sure to ask the school for help in accessing those records.
The erosion of parental rights in education in the Cameron school district
It was long ago established that parents have the absolute right to direct the education of their children. I contend that the Cameron R-1 school district is doing an end run around those rights by knowingly providing explicit adult content to our children without informing the public. This is especially true for the books the school’s book review committee has reviewed and restricted.
The board of education is derelict in its responsibility to provide oversight and inform the community
During board meetings where the Cameron R-1 school district was provided the recommendations of the book review committee, they failed to ask any questions or even vote to accept the committee’s recommendations. It would have been reasonable to ask questions such as why books were restricted or what guidelines the committee used to make decisions. The board failed in every instance to ask questions, demand transparency for the book review process, or take any vote. The board entirely abdicated its responsibilities to the community and refused to provide any oversight.
Actions the school district and board should take to inform and empower parents
To properly inform and empower parents, the Cameron R-1 school district and board should:
- Provide detailed content warnings alongside book descriptions in Destiny Discover
- Publish clear criteria used by the book review committee for restricting materials
- Ensure transparent communication about why specific books are restricted
- Implement proper oversight procedures to prevent unauthorized access to restricted materials
- Respect parental rights by making the review process more accessible, transparent and informative
- Create policy that strengthens parental rights and allows a formal book challenge process
Parents deserve to make truly informed decisions about their children’s reading materials. The current system falls short of providing the transparency and information parents need to exercise their fundamental right to guide their children’s education.
In a shocking turn of events, the Cameron R-1 school district has been quietly removing challenged books from the high school library. These books that have been removed were previously challenged under a now rescinded policy for their “graphic” and “sexually explicit content”. A list of those challenged books can be found on our Dirty Book List.
Before I get too far into this article I would like to extend my gratitude to the Cameron R-1 school district and its board of education. It took more than 2 years, but they appear to have finally taken this explicit adult content seriously. I pray this is them taking steps to restore some good old fashioned family values to our small rural Missouri community. Please take the time to let them know you appreciate that they’re taking steps to protect our children and for beginning to restore parental rights.
The list of books we believe to have been removed
The following 8 books were among the first 80 books that were challenged. Some of these books we physically held in our hands, some we found through the district provided Destiny access. The district initially confirmed these books were in the district. Our search today shows the books mentioned below are no longer present in the Cameron R-1 school districts high school library.
We will provide a link to a page for each of these books where you will find information about the book. That page includes additional links with passages where you can read the content. In one case, for the book Lucky, you will also find a link to video with some of its passages being read to the board in March of 2023. Two years later it appears that horrible content is no longer in our public schools.
WARNING !! The text and video in the following itemized links contain explicit adult content that is NOT appropriate for children.
- Lucky by Alice Seabold- informational link – Video link
- Lovely Bones by Alice Seabold- informational link
- Like a Love Story by Nazemian- informational link
- Friday by Robert Heinlein – informational link
- Fallout by Ellen Hopkins- informational link
- Smoke by Ellen Hopkins – informational link
- The Duff by Kody Keplinger – informational link
- Living Dead Girl by Elizabeth Scott – informational link
- Maus by Art Spiegelman – informational link (We believe there were two of them, books 1 and 2 but cannot confirm)
How to search the library contents online
If you would like to confirm the absence of these books, or to see what other books are available in the Cameron high school library you can search for free using Go Follett. Be sure to compare the description of the books you will find there to descriptions in the links above.
Were other books removed?
Excellent question. We have submitted a Missouri sunshine law request seeking a full list of books that have been removed from the high school library. We are awaiting for the district to respond and provide us with those records. There will be an updated article once we receive and comb through those records. We hope to be able to provide you with a complete list of all the books that have been removed.
Why were the books removed?
The justification for the removal of these books is not yet clear. At least 3 of the books, The DUFF, Lucky and Looking for Alaska were voted on by the book review committee to retain, with restrictions. If or when a new vote was taken is unclear. The link to the last found book review committee update is from the June 2024 school board meeting. It is a document from the districts provider and will likely save to your downloads folder.
Because we were unclear about why these books were removed we included in our sunshine law request the documents that show the vote(s) by the committee to remove these books and any cited justification or cause for their removal. Once we receive and process those sunshine law requests we will be sure to provide an update.
Thank you, Cameron R-1 schools board of education
I would like to personally extend my sincere gratitude for your courage in finally taking a stand to protect our children and starting a much needed return to family values and morality in our community. I hope you will consider providing an update at next weeks school board meeting regarding this matter. It is of significant interest to the community.
Please let us know how you’re deciding which books needed to be removed and your plans moving forward for further restrictions or removals. Our children are our greatest treasure, thank you for recognizing they needed protected from harmful sexually explicit content. I know it has been a stressful and difficult path, but those who do the right thing when its hard should be celebrated, not ridiculed.
At the June 2025 Cameron R-1 school district school board meeting, a concerned resident addressed the school board about yet another book. After giving a much needed content warning, Mr. Gilbert reads passages from the book Identical, which is found in the high school library, from the book Identical. The 7 person school board didn’t appear concerned by the content.
What is in that book that causes concern
The passages Mr Gilbert read includes graphic details of a father grooming and then involving one of his identical daughters in a sex act. Even when those passages were described in medical terms the local Cameron paper refused to publish that letter to the editor. He denied it because it was too graphic.
Here is the video of that address to the board. For those of you who would like to confirm this content is in the book we will provide the Rated Books link to the book Identical.
At the May 2025 school board meeting the Cameron, MO board of eduction appeared to dismiss the concerns of local resident Heath Gilbert when he asserted the school district is violating the 1st Amendment protections for freedom of speech. Gilbert asserts the deviations from district policy requiring residents to make their home address and cell number a public record as a condition of addressing the board both compel and chill free speech.
In what could be described as a violation of their oath of office to the constitutions of Missouri and the United States, the entire board of education appear to have dismissed those concerns and showed support for the efforts by the district and Superintendent Matt Robinson. What are those new requirements and how do they violate the 1st Amendment?
The cause of this claim for 1st Amendment violations revolves around a “form” the district requires everyone to complete as a condition of being able to exercise ones right to address the board during a public meeting. We will discuss the form next.
Details about the districts “form”
When a member of the public makes the required request to address the board of eduction they are provided with a link to an online form. The school district requires this form to be completed as a condition of being granted permission to speak to the board. Failing to complete any portion of this form will result in a denial to address the school board.
The district requires residents provide their name, email address, cell phone number and home address before asking for details on what you want to discuss. They also require you to offer a solution to the stated issue.
Failure to complete any portion of the form, or to complete it accurately, will result in a denial of being added to the agenda to address the board.
Is the “form” part of school policy?
Absolutely not. The board policy and requirements for being added to the agenda to address the board are outlined in policy C-140-P. There is no mention of “form” in that policy or any requirement to make one’s name, address and phone number a public record as a condition of addressing the board.
The policy does require everyone to meet with the superintendent as a condition of addressing the board, but Superintendent Matt Robinson refuses to hold those meetings. The board ignores staff not following board policy and refuses to instruct him to follow policy and hold those meetings, as required in current policy.
Cameron schools compel speech of residents
As of December 2024, the Cameron school district began to compel anyone wishing to address the board to make their home address and cell phone numbers a public record as a condition of speaking to the board. Because of the Missouri sunshine law, any addresses, phone numbers or other information submitted to the district as a condition of speaking to the board becomes a public record.
The school district is required by law to make that personal information submitted via the “form” available to anyone who requests it. The school district and board of education are comfortable with making your personal information available to public. Requiring one to speak or telling them what they must say is compelled speech and a clear 1st Amendment violation.
Can public schools or governmental bodies compel speech?
Absolutely not. The Cameron school district and board of education are governmental bodies subject to compelled speech restrictions. Fortunately there are several Supreme Court cases where they have weighed in and offered opinions on compelled speech. Examples of these opinions include the infamous cake baker Jack Phillips out of Colorado. He was sued multiple times for refusing to bake various cakes which violated his religious belief. To force him to bake a cake would be compelled speech.
You can read examples of Supreme Court cases describing the dangers of compelled speech in this article by Neal Hardin. Compelled speech is dangerous and a violation of the 1st Amendment.
How is the Cameron school district chilling speech?
The same form and the requirement to disclose personal information can cause someone to not address the board out of fear of reprisal or retaliation. The Cameron school districts requirement to make personal information a public record can cause someone to not exercise their freedom of speech out of fear of reprisal or retaliation. That is chilled speech.
Here is a real life example. At the December 2023 school board meeting the book topic was on the school board meeting agenda here in Cameron. Concerned members of the public spoke against the books and their sexually explicit adult content being made available to children. Three school staff members addressed the board in favor of those books. One teacher referred to the efforts of the men who were leading the opposition of those books as a circus, implying they are clowns. She used strong language implying that racism, bigotry and misandry were the root causes of any issues with the books. Would she still be willing to call out those men and book review committee and once again make those same accusations knowing they could obtain her home address and cell phone number?
Or is it more likely that this teacher would be concerned one of those men would contact her on her cell phone or show up at her front door after implying they were clowns. Would she be willing to use the same language as she had previously back in December, or would she be compelled to use softer language or not mention them at all? The intellectually honest answer is anyone would likely soften their statements to the Cameron school board or choose not to address them at all out of concern of harassment or threats by someone who doesn’t like what they said.
This is what chilling speech looks like. And your Cameron R-1 schools board of education supports the actions of the district which compels speech, chills speech and does not align with school policy. They ban members of the public for not following policy but ignore and excuse when staff do the same.
What is the cause of these new restrictions on free speech?
We can only speculate as neither the district or board of education have explained the deviation from policy. To put it simply, they want to control what information is shared with the community at these board meetings about the school. This is an attempt to control or limit what is said.
A quick look at the new Rules of Decorum for the district and you will see that the district has granted itself the right to terminate the designated public forum time allotted for a member of the public if they bring up something that is not on their form. See the seconded bulleted item in number 2 of the Decorum Rules document.
To further speculate, I would guess it stems from the November 2024 board meeting where resident Heath Gilbert used the veil of body worn cameras to bring up alleged incidents of sexual assault of students at the elementary school and on a school bus. You can see that video below.
Final closing statement statement
Each Cameron school district board member swore an oath to the constitutions of the state of Missouri and these United States. The new requirement that forces residents, teachers and students to make their phone numbers and home address a public record is compelling speech. This practice can and has chilled speech because residents don’t want to make that information a public record. Chilled and compelled speech are both clear violations of the 1st Amendment. For the board members to support these blatant violations is also a clear violation of their oaths of office. How can we trust the actions and words of these board members if they don’t take one of our nations most sacred oaths seriously?
Please consider peacefully contacting your elected school board members and urge them to honor their oaths and stop this madness. The email address for the board can be found on their webpage or you can email the entire board directly at boardofeducation@cameronschools.org
Last nights Cameron R-1 school districts board meeting we heard concern raised about possible unnecessary and wasteful spending in the district. Were these legitimate concerns about wasteful spending, or a veiled attempt by the district to discredit a local resident? Let’s flesh this out a little and allow you to draw your own conclusion.
The relevant discussion happened in the first few minutes of last nights meeting. School board vice president Ryan Murphy brought up a concern and started a discussion about a large bill for attorney services to redact records for a single Missouri Sunshine Law request. During the discussion about that bill, board member Pam Ice asks Superintendent Matt Robinson how much that specific records request cost the district to make redactions. Matt responded that it was $8200. That is unquestionably a lot of money.
You can watch that full exchange in the following video. But be sure to continue reading as we will provide additional and relevant details about likely reasons why attorneys are now making these redactions.
Can those redaction be made by school staff to save money?
That is the relevant question I would have liked one of the board members to have asked superintendent Robinson. Board members Peck, Ice and board president Lockridge all joined in the conversation to share concern about the cost for redactions. They were concerned about the cost, why were there no questions on how the district could reduce that cost?
I believe that both the district and school board have a fiduciary responsibility to the tax payers to spend our money wisely. Paying a law firm $200 plus dollars an hour to redact names from public records doesn’t seem like a good use of tax dollars IF those redactions can be made by the district.
Around the 2 minute and 45 second mark in the above YouTube video, Robinson mentions the district can only charge the individual requesting the records an amount equal to the lowest paid qualified staff member to complete that task. Robinson mentions that is around $20 an hour.
Why then isn’t the Cameron school district making their own redactions and saving tax payers $180 an hour? Of course hindsight is 20/20, but this would have been a good question for a member of the board to ask. I’d love to hear a cost reduction question at every board meeting!
Has the school district previously completed their own records redactions
That is another question I would have liked to hear a board member ask. And if the answer provided was “yes”, a follow on question to ask why the change from previous and cheaper in house redactions. The board didn’t ask those questions, but i can still provide an answer to that question.
Yes, the Cameron school district has made its own redactions in the past.
In this screenshot you will see an email response from the district where they state that the superintendent was personally redacting records requests previously. Why was the highest paid staff member for the district conducting this task?
This image is from one of my own Sunshine Law requests and the redactions being made were staff names, the same type of redactions made in the $8200 request mentioned at last nights May 20th board meeting. If the district was previously able of making redactions to protect the names of district employees, why outsource that task to a significantly more expensive law firm? Another good question I wish one of the board members had asked.
Why did the Cameron school district stop completing their own redactions for records request?
While it is typically frowned on to comment on such questions with mere speculation, in this instance my answer is based on irrefutable fact. Records we previously obtained through Sunshine Law requests pertaining to the dirty book fight appear to indicated unlawful redactions made by the district.
One of the redactions appears to be an attempt to avoid transparency and coverup proof of records the district previously said didn’t exist. We can show you that unlawful redaction.
To the right in the attached screenshot you can see a record with a poorly made redaction. The link is to a google document of book votes taken by a book review committee. This is important because when I originally asked for records of these votes I was told that no records existed. This redaction appears to be an attempt made by the district to cover up the existence of public records. This is the exact opposite of transparency.
When did the district switch to using lawyers for redactions
If Mr Murphy were to extend his records request he shared with the board and made a public record at last nights meeting to around the time of my records request, I suspect we will find an uptick in the billable hours by Ed Council. It is my belief that it was around this time that found this unlawful redaction and attempt to avoid transparency that the district began outsourcing simple redaction duties to its law firm.
Was this a personal attack or legitimate concern about wasteful spending
Once again I can only speculate on this question. In the 2 plus years I have been attending these board meetings, last night was the first time I recall a monthly expense budget item being questioned during a meeting. If this was a one time event and we don’t hear similar questions in the future, we have our answer.
I hope that I am wrong. I hope this is a sincere concern about possible wasteful spending of our tax dollars in the Cameron R-1 school district. I hope to see additional concerns about expenses brought up at future meetings. Hopefully routine series of questions are developed and asked during those meetings to ensure our hard earned tax dollars are being spent responsibly and wisely.
In a recent post on Facebook by Cameron R-1 School board candidate Michael Barlow responds to questions asked by the local Cameron Newspapers. One of the questions asked of all the school board candidates relates to the 2 year battle over sexually explicit books in the Cameron R-1 public school libraries.
The response from Mr. Barlow highlights one of the issues we have been vocal about over the past 2 years. I have no doubt Mr Barlow believes those things, but his belief is based on a lack of information from the Cameron R-1 schools. There is a serious lack of transparency in the school district and the community simply doesn’t know the reality of our book fight with the school.
In his statement, which you can read in its entirety HERE, Michael said the following about how he believes the book issue will be handled moving forward.
“A legitimate concern has been brought forward about content in books. My belief is this will continue to be identified, addressed, and corrected by the school district.” – Michael Barlow for Cameron School Board
What the Cameron community doesn’t know, the school superintendent knew 6 months before we found and went public with the first book challenges these books were there. The district knew, had the opportunity to quietly remove them, and did nothing. Matt Robinson, school superintendent, ignored the issue and waited for parents or the community to figure it out. How do we know this? Public records obtained through a Missouri Sunshine Law request.
The following image was 
obtained through a public records request. This email was sent by Matt Robinson to the entire boards of education. Go to the last paragraph and read the last two sentences. Matt Robinson told the board of education “I sat down with all librarians in August and shared by thoughts on controversial books and shared our day is coming, it’s only a matter of time. Well, our day arrived last Thursday.” – Cameron R-1 school superintendent
The Cameron R-1 School district knew we had abhorrent and deviant sexually explicit books in our school libraries. They also knew they had books with content that was of concern and would likely be challenged. Children were checking out and reading these books while the problem was ignored. Instead of being proactive and getting ahead of the issue, they did nothing and waited for these sexually explicit books to be discovered by someone else. They knew these books were in our libraries and chose to do NOTHING.
The Cameron community largely believes the school district is addressing the book issue. Because of a lack of transparency by the school district and the board of education the community doesn’t know the truth of the matter. Every step taken by the Cameron school district relating to the sexually explicit and other adult content in these books has been reactive.
The following is a bulleted list of things I do not believe the community knows about the book issue, the Cameron R-1 school district and the board of education.
- The school district has no plan for the district to identify any other remaining books with adult content. They are relying on parents and the community to find them.
- Despite relying on the community to identify books with adult content, the district and board refuse to allow the community access to the libraries to inspect books. Parents are not allowed to see the books being provided to their children.
- The Cameron school district and board of education have ignored every one of our questions about the educational value or curriculum objective of these books.
- The school and board president have ignored every request for a community engagement meeting to talk about the book issue. They do NOT want to be on the record talking about this.
- The “book review committee” meets in secret and keeps no records of any kind.
- The procedure used by the book review committee to determine if a book needs to be restricted is also secret. They refuse to provide any documents.
- The reason a book has been restricted by the book review committee is also a secret. The school will not tell the community what content is on those restricted books.
- Once a book has been restricted, the school doesn’t share any information with parents that would empower us to determine if we want our children to read these books. They have used tax payer resources to pay employees to review these books. Why not document the process and inform the public?
- there is no policy that allows a parent or tax payer to challenge a book. Most every other Missouri school has that policy.
- unlike every other school in our area, Cameron has no policy that would allow a member of the community to challenge a decision by the book review committee and ask the school board to take a vote and make the final decision.
- Cameron did have both of those policies in place but rescinded them both when I challenged the decisions of the first book review committees.
- Cameron does not have a policy that covers the selection of library books. It is entirely at the discretion of the librarian. This is likely why we have so many inappropriate books in Cameron.
- In two years, the Cameron school district and board of education have NEVER addressed the community or publicly talked about what kind of books are appropriate for our district.
- The only public responses by the board of education is to cite “diversity”. Do they truly believe that “diversity” requires we provide abhorrent content to children?
- The Cameron school board doesn’t like the book issue, so they changed policy and limit us to discussing books once every 3 months. Even with new information relevant to the book topic, the board refuses.
Update on our previous post about the “Book Tasting” event from the Cameron Missouri high school. We have obtained clarification from the district and a copy of the documents seen in picture from the Cameron R-1 schools Facebook page. We will share that clarification and the 43 page document we received.
Today we received an email that documented a Missouri Sunshine law response that was forwarded to us. A concerned tax payer had request a copy of the document seen in the districts Facebook post about the “book tasting” event. The school district has fulfilled that records request and provided a clarifying statement. You can see the documents in the following image on the flat surface under the monitor.
According to the statement in the email response Mr Landi received, that document seen in the photo was apparently unrelated to the book tasting event and wasn’t intended specifically for the book tasting even. Here is the districts statement.
The following link will allow you to download the 43 page PDF provided by the Cameron R-1 school distinct.
Looking at this document and all of its pages, I am left with the two different gut feelings. First, this material lacks any warnings to the type of adult content found in these restricted books. Second, it seems this document is intended to get children interested in reading the adult content that superintendent Matt Robinson personally determined needed to be restricted to all students except those who are 18 years old. Is the school district truly spending tax payer resources to encourage children to read sexually explicit adult content?
It is interesting that the school district chose to use school district staff and resources to create this “unfettered review” for students. Despite being asked to do so for almost 2 years, the district refuses to create a similar document for parents. We want something that outlines the content in these books that caused the superintendent to restrict them. I believe it is reasonable for the Cameron R-1 school district to provide parents with a resource like this 43 page PDF that would allow us to make an informed decision about allowing our children to read these books.
Currently the Cameron R-1 school district doesn’t provide parents with anything that explains why a specific book has been restricted by the district. Even the Destiny Discover service parents can use doesn’t describe the content in these books. Superintendent Matt Robinson determined these books needed to be restricted, doesn’t the school district owe it to the parents to tell us why?
In a previous blog post titled “Reents-Dickkut says students can “view” restricted books” we covered what appears to be an intentional run around of the parents wishes. Restricted books were provided to the class without at least one parents approval. Dickkut appears to have admitted as much in her email response to a concerned parent.
Considering those two books, Speak and Hate U Give, were among the 43 pages in this document, I do not believe the district can claim this was an accident. The cover of each pages specifically states “These books require a parent signed Full Access Agreement” on every page. That is pretty clear to me. Here are those two books as seen in this document.
The Cameron R-1 school district has spent two years ignoring our questions about these books. Of course, I have more questions after inspecting this document. Who created this document and why? Was it created by direction of school administrators? Which one? Or is this dimply the act of one person and another attempt to indoctrinate our children and circumvent the will of parents.
I will close out this post by sharing an Instagram post from an account appearing to belong to the high school librarian. They are recording an unboxing video as the appear to promote a series of different LBTQAlphabetSoup books. Several of those books seen in this video have been restricted or outright removed because of their adult content.
Did you catch her mention of “diversity” as she discussed these books with a student? Notice her hashtags on that post in the description under the video? Yes, we have DEI in the Cameron R-1 school district.
On February 6, the Cameron, MO high school shared out a post on it’s Facebook Page highlighting a “book tasting” event held by ELA teacher Jennifer Reents-Dickkut for her sophomore level Language Arts class. One local parent noticed that among the images posted by the Cameron school district were 3 titles that had been restricted by the school superintendent, Matt Robinson. These books were restricted because of the adult content they contained and were not to be given to under age children without express permission from a parent through a form provided by the district.
Here is the original post on the Cameron R-1 High Schools Facebook page. Three different “restricted” titles are visible in the included photos for this post
In a strange turn of events, we received an email that was forwarded by a parent who had a child in that class. That parents child was given the restricted book The Hate U Give without the parents consent. This parent emailed Mrs Dickkut to ask why their child was given a restricted book without consent. The following screenshot was taken from the bizarre response which seems to suggest that superintendent Robinson’s restriction on books is only for reading, viewing them is acceptable. See the blue highlighted portion in the image below.
“There is a policy to read books with permission, but nothing on the form about viewing them. ” – Jennifer Reents-Dickkut
Yes, Mrs Dickkut appears to defend her actions by suggesting that school restrictions that prohibit her from providing restricted books to children without parental written approval doesn’t apply to just “viewing”.
Considering the 2 year long fight in Cameron over all of these explicit books with adult content, it doesn’t seem reasonable that this was a mistake or a misunderstanding of policy. Dickkut was at the same board meetings as me when the superintendent and board discussed these restricted books and how they were to be handled. It was very clear. Restricted books were to be segregated in a library closet and not to be given to students under the age of 18 without first getting parental approval on a book restriction form. There was ZERO discussion about any differences between reading and viewing.
In a story we shared yesterday, you can see Mrs. Dickkut admitted to this parent that she told the students in advance that there were restricted books being used in the book tasting. This struck me as odd, because we were told by the Cameron school district and our board of education that access to restricted books would be controlled and only students with parental consent would be provided a restricted book. This appears to be a deliberate act by an activist teacher to disobey her administrators and board of education.